top of page

Compromise and What's Expected

There are a number of social conventions that are broadly undermined by polyamorous relating but especially so by non-hierarchical relationships and relationships that are informed by a relationship anarchist philosophy. One of these is the notion that our relationships should be largely composed of compromises. The relationship anarchist manifesto goes so far as to say "Love is not more real when people compromise for each other because it's part of what is expected" and "Rather than looking for compromises in every situation, let loved ones choose paths that keep their integrity intact, without letting this mean a crisis for the relationship." This runs totally counter to conventional wisdom about how every relationship will mean compromise, how you won't find exactly what you look for in a partner, you need to meet people where they are, etc.





I want us to talk for a moment about how these aren't mutually exclusive, but compromise is not the only solution to a lack of perfect alignment.A compromise leaves us in a position where no one has exactly what they want from the situation - everyone is "giving" a bit, but hopefully not too much in the long run. For some people, it may be the right choice.


For those of us who are heavily autonomy focused, instead building the relationship in the places we can sincerely connect within each of our boundaries - inside the overlap of the Venn diagram where we can meet without compromise; and acknowledging that as different people sometimes our partners' choices are different than ours and change the shape of those relationships - can be difficult sometimes but really valuable and an alternative framework to those compromises. We have different challenges that feel more "worth it" to us.


These quotes about compromise in the Manifesto are located beneath the heading about not approaching our relationships from a place of entitlement, "Love and Respect Instead of Entitlement," and follow the idea that "your history together does not make you entitled to command and control a partner to comply with what is considered normal in a relationship. Explore how you can engage without stepping over boundaries and personal beliefs." Even if you aren't expressly engaging from a relationship anarchist point of view, I think many polyamorous folks are trying to deconstruct these normative ideals and can gain a lot from examining whether they’re exploring the relationship between the partners’ boundaries.


___________


join me and Ro Moed of Unapolygetically for class on Sunday 2/4 tickets here, to discuss this and more!

559 views10 comments

Recent Posts

See All

10 comentarios


han gu
han gu
05 jun

论文代写的好处不仅仅是能够解放你的时间和精力,还能够帮助你提升学术水平和写作能力。通过与论文代写 https://www.essayghostwriting.com/ 专家的沟通和合作,你可以学习到更多关于学术写作的技巧和方法,同时也可以了解到各个学科领域的研究动态和前沿知识。

Me gusta

Your information is extremely helpful, and I'd like to add that https://gpa-calculator.info is a fun and exciting way to spend time with loved ones and friends when you have some spare time.

Me gusta

I love how Drift Boss combines racing and drifting.

Me gusta

Thank you for shedding light on the idea that compromise isn't the only way to navigate differences in relationships, especially in non-hierarchical and relationship anarchist dynamics. Building connections within the overlap of boundaries feels more authentic and respectful of each person's autonomy. snake game

Me gusta

Kaliteli buhar deneyimi arayanlar için SMOK elektronik sigara! Uzun ömürlü pil, şık tasarım ve yüksek buhar performansı sizleri bekliyor.

Me gusta
bottom of page