Religion & Polyamory
- Laura Boyle
- Oct 27, 2021
- 5 min read
We’ve talked before about how our essentially mono-normative culture gives all of us certain social cues and expectations that folks embarking on non monogamous relationship journeys need to unpack from and escape from some to be internally comfortable and successful - and that reaching a place of emotional and embodied equilibrium and safety can be an entire step after reaching an intellectual understanding of our relationship desires. (Friends & non-mono countrymen with trauma history, lend me your ears - knowing things in our heads doesn’t always put our attachment habits, bodies, and vagus nerves on board with our intentions - let’s get our bodies on board too, and roll forward, here.) A part of my culture, here in the USA, that often gets brief attention and immediate dismissal in polyam spaces, is religious background. In my experience, local polyamorous communities tend to take it as given that you’re no longer religious, or you’re non-traditionally spiritual, or you’re part of a very liberal splinter spin off of a church that invites everyone to worship (and you still get some side-eye and might not be fully out at church). As a no-longer-religious, currently-agnostic, done-a-bunch-of-religious-texts-as-literature-and-ritual-and-myth-studies human, I fit that stereotype personally.
But lots of folks don’t, or at least don’t in a neat pattern. I know plenty of folks who are believers to a deep and important level in their lives, and don’t find that to be in conflict with non-monogamous relating. (Many of them are non-Christian, but not all of them, which has been an interesting exploration of patterns. People from more strictly structured religious groups in terms of hierarchy within the group - leadership that instructs a ‘flock’ or a defined not-leading class of any kind, regardless of group size - seem to have had more tendency to either change what group they practice with, change their belief, or leave religion as a concept while beginning to explore non monogamy, and more Christian groups featured this kind of structure than the folks I’ve met from non-Christian backgrounds for the most part.) A few people were happy to talk to me for a series about this on the podcast that’s coming up, and today, I’d like to share a little about how my religious upbringing affected my view of relationships.

I grew up Catholic, in a part of the US where about a third of the population is Catholic, another third is various flavors of Christian, about ten percent are various practitioners of other religious faiths, and the just about twenty percent remaining are somewhere between non-practicing and non-believing unaffiliated people. That’s a heck of a lot of Christian influence, and a lot of power of being in the biggest sect around. We never had to explain not eating meat on Fridays for portions of the year - a big chunk of the rest of the kids at school were doing it, or explaining that they used the under-12 loophole for fasting & dietary requirements until the day they turned 12 in their house. This would lead to cognitive distortions about how our cultural impact worked - simultaneously, my folks would complain that no one took religion seriously anymore or lived life according to it, and my dad would say “well, Catholics in the northeast don’t have to be strident and proselytizing about our beliefs - we run the school schedules and the legislatures, so we can let folks do what they want, and do what we want at home and not worry about it.” (He’d contrast this to evangelicals we’d see on TV or out and about.) But that underlying “let’s make sure we drum in our values at home,” was definitely still a thing, as was/is the culturally underlying series of messages about what a good life, relationship, and personhood should be like.
There’s a lot of repression and shame tied into messages about how sexuality should (or shouldn’t except in the very limited circumstance of marriage) work given to us in a religiously motivated upbringing - and unpacking that can take folks a long time and require giving away a lot of the ‘stuff’ that came attached to that shame. Part of the “catholics don’t need to proselytize” meant that we got reasonable sex ed in school (blue states for the win) but the message at home was very much, “ok, but only stupid sluts use that information.” You can imagine how that went over. Exploring outside of rigidly defined roles of how sex works, of how marriage could work for me (and how cohabitation could work for me, and how choosing not to cohabit works for me…) has helped me become immensely more confident in myself - but along the way I went from a church-every-sunday, do-you-prefer-that-mass-in-english-or-latin?, shall-we-debate-the-opinions-of-the-early-church-leaders? Person to someone who has read entirely too much religious theory and doctrine not only in the religious tradition I was raised in, but several more (Thanks, too many religious studies electives at McGill, and the library was great), but doesn’t subscribe to much beyond a vague sense of doing right and respecting other humans. Some people shed their shame-based inner voices without shedding the traditions and practices, but I couldn’t.
Some would argue that it wasn’t all or even mostly religion - that a lot of the messages I got were “find the one” and “base your life around seeking pure romance” and things like this that are largely societal constructs we all get in a mono-normative culture - but having been raised in a culture largely built around my religion or related religions (nearly 70% of the people in the area I grew up in are some flavor of Christian) I feel like that’s a big part of where it comes from. If we’re going to build people into our marriage-based, hetero-normative, mono-normative view of how relationships work, as per the religion’s view of sacramentally pairing folks off, then writing our stories, media, and goals for relationships into that shape makes perfect sense; and having to exit a LOT of cultural scripts when we exit the romantic ones similarly makes sense.
For the upcoming podcast series, I get to talk to folks who had a wide variety of experiences with this - who are still in their religious practices and who aren't, and who are from a few different backgrounds - but this is where I come at it from. My journey has been one of self-discovery, of deliberate decision making about the path I want, and shedding a lot of cultural and religious expectation and practice along the way.
------
You can find the podcast at readyforpolyamory.fireside.fm, you can join us on facebook at www.facebook.com/groups/readyforpolyamory, follow on Twitter @lauracb88 & instagram @readyforpolyamory, on TikTok @readyforpolyamory, and if you'd like to support us financially we're on ko-fi at ko-fi.com/readyforpolyamory. You can find 1-1 and group peer support sessions here. The book is available on Amazon; please leave a review if you enjoy it!




32win1 mình ghé thử vì thấy bạn bè nhắc, kiểu vào xem giao diện ra sao thôi. Ấn tượng đầu là trang nhìn khá thoáng, chia từng khối nội dung rõ ràng nên lướt nhanh cũng không bị rối mắt. Mình thích cái cách họ đặt phần giới thiệu tổng quan ngay trên trang, đọc vài dòng là nắm được họ hoạt động từ 2016 và có nhắc giấy phép PAGCOR, cảm giác đỡ phải đi tìm thông tin linh tinh. Menu nằm chỗ dễ thấy, bấm qua lại mượt, chữ không quá dày nên đọc không mệt. Nói chung cảm giác giống mấy site làm chỉn chu, không màu mè quá. Mình để ý mấy tiêu đề và hộp…
O8 mình thấy bạn bè nhắc hoài nên cũng ghé thử cho biết, chủ yếu xem họ làm trang có dễ đọc không. Vào cái là thấy kiểu trình bày khá gọn, chữ nghĩa chia khối rõ nên lướt nhanh vẫn nắm được ý chính. Mình để ý họ có đoạn nói về giấy phép, có nhắc PAGCOR với Isle of Man ngay trong phần giới thiệu nên cảm giác họ cố tình đặt thông tin “pháp lý” ở chỗ dễ thấy cho người mới. Mấy tiêu đề cũng đặt nổi, kéo xuống không bị dính một cục dài lê thê. Nói chung mình thích kiểu họ tách nội dung thành từng block và để phần giấy phép chứng nhận…
HUBET88 mình ghé thử cho biết thôi vì thấy bạn bè nhắc hoài, kiểu tò mò xem giao diện ra sao chứ không có ý định ngồi lâu. Vừa vào trang chủ là thấy họ bố cục theo từng khối khá rõ, nhìn lướt một vòng là biết chỗ nào để giải trí, chỗ nào là phần hỗ trợ thông tin, không bị rối mắt. Mình cũng để ý họ có nhắc chuyện đôi khi link truy cập có thể thay đổi để tránh nghẽn, đọc vậy thấy đỡ hoang mang hơn nếu hôm nào vào không được. Chữ với tiêu đề trình bày vừa phải, không nhồi quá nhiều thứ cùng lúc nên kéo xuống vẫn theo kịp, và…
s666 dạo này thấy nhiều người nhắc nên mình cũng bấm vào nghía thử cho biết thôi. Mình không rành mấy trò bên trong, chủ yếu xem cách họ làm trang có dễ nhìn không. Vừa vào thấy bố cục khá thoáng, chữ không bị dồn, kéo xuống là các khối nội dung tách ra rõ nên lướt nhanh vẫn nắm được ý chính. Mình thử trên điện thoại thì load ổn, chuyển qua lại mấy mục không bị đứng hay giật khó chịu. Có cái mình để ý là họ nhấn mạnh phần bảo mật tài khoản kiểu mã hóa dữ liệu, đọc qua thấy yên tâm hơn chút. Nói chung nhìn giống kiểu làm gọn gàng để người…
luongsontv dạo này mình thấy bạn bè hay gửi link xem bóng đá online nên mình cũng ghé thử cho biết. Mình không phải kiểu ngồi canh từng trận đâu, chủ yếu tò mò xem trang làm có dễ dùng không. Vào cái là thấy tải khá nhanh, với lại không bị bắt đăng ký tài khoản nên đỡ phiền hẳn. Mình lướt một vòng thì thấy họ để nội dung chính khá rõ ràng, nhìn phát biết chỗ nào để xem tiếp chứ không phải mò mẫm. Cũng thích cái cảm giác ít bị quảng cáo kiểu che màn hình, nên thao tác bấm qua lại không bị giật mình. Nói chung giao diện nhìn đơn giản mà dễ…