Polycules and Constellations
- Laura Boyle
- Aug 6, 2021
- 2 min read
I call my network of relationships a polycule. This is a portmanteau of polyamory and molecule, and it’s a word that I find to be cute as a button. It has come to my attention that Some Of The World At Large only like to use polycule if they can see neat, defined ends to your network - if no one is actively dating; if you’re a closed little shape; if you really are a molecule, and not even a particularly complicated one. These same People (many of them very bold from being anonymous online) also reject constellation as a term for a group of polyamorous folks, because “it’s not like the stars just grab new ones.”

...I suppose it’s not. It is, however, like polycule, a perfectly serviceable metaphor that they’re insisting on blowing up because change makes them very uncomfortable? Because they’ve taken the idea that polyamory must equal a closed unit of folks all in love with one another from some documentary or other and run with it a little too hard and fast? It seems like something along those lines. It makes me slightly irritated because honestly, they’re nice words and clear metaphors and so much better than people trying to make up portmanteaux with the word couple involved (let me tell you, my network-poly-I-was-only-seeing-one-person-photo getting a “happy holidays to the pentouple!” comment was old as soon as it happened. Never again) and they work even when there is flux. Molecules change naturally when they interact with other molecules. Totally normal to lose one atom here or there and gain another, just as over the years relationships change and so might a polycule.
The killjoys would prefer we always say “Relationship network,” which to me sounds like I’m producing very poor television. I use it sometimes, when I’m being technical. It is a technical term. But just as one could call a pregnant woman and her partner “a mating pair” one wouldn’t, in casual conversation. You’d call them a couple. So, polycule, not relationship network, for me, mostly.
_____
You can find the podcast at readyforpolyamory.fireside.fm, you can join us on facebook at www.facebook.com/groups/readyforpolyamory, follow on Twitter @lauracb88 & instagram @readyforpolyamory, and if you'd like to support us financially we're on Patreon at www.patreon.com/readyforpolyamory and ko-fi at ko-fi.com/readyforpolyamory.




Hồi sáng nay trong khi mình đang đọc các bình luận trao đổi trên mạng, mình thấy https://789bet7a.com/ được chèn vào và được mọi người nhắc tới nhiều. Mình bấm xem cho biết, để xem cách trình bày và cấu trúc nội dung. Lướt nhanh thì thấy tổng thể khá gọn gàng, tạo cảm giác đáng tin cậy. Với mình, chỉ cần nội dung gọn gàng như vậy là đủ để mình nắm bắt thông tin cơ bản.
https://www.oktkbd.com/ আমি একবার সাইটটি দেখে নিয়েছিলাম, মূলত এর ইন্টারফেস এবং কনটেন্ট বিন্যাস কেমন তা বোঝার জন্য। প্রথম নজরে ডিজাইনটি বেশ পরিষ্কার ও গোছানো মনে হয়েছে। বিভিন্ন বিভাগ আলাদা করে সাজানো থাকায় প্রয়োজনীয় তথ্য খুঁজে পাওয়া তুলনামূলক সহজ। মোবাইলেও পেজটি ভালোভাবে প্রদর্শিত হয়েছে এবং নেভিগেশন ব্যবহার করতেও সুবিধাজনক লেগেছে। সামগ্রিকভাবে, কনটেন্ট উপস্থাপনার ধরনটি বেশ সরল ও ব্যবহারবান্ধব মনে হয়েছে।
Mình từng thấy F168 được nhắc đến khi đang lướt qua một bài thảo luận nên cũng tò mò vào xem thử. Mình chỉ xem nhanh giao diện tổng thể và cách các nội dung hiển thị trên trang. Cảm giác ban đầu là bố cục khá dễ nhìn, mọi thứ được sắp xếp tương đối hợp lý nên không mất nhiều thời gian làm quen. Xem qua một lúc thì mình thoát ra và quay lại đọc tiếp như lúc đầu.
Trong quá trình đọc các thảo luận, mình có để ý thấy tt888.io được nhắc qua nên thử vào xem cho biết. Mình chỉ xem nhanh tổng thể chứ chưa tìm hiểu sâu, nhưng cảm giác ban đầu là cách trình bày khá thoáng, bố cục rõ ràng, nhìn vào không bị rối mắt
আমি অনেককে এই অ্যাপটি নিয়ে উৎসাহের সাথে আলোচনা করতে দেখেছিলাম,75bd.app তাই আমিও এটি ব্যবহার করে দেখার সিদ্ধান্ত নিলাম। আমার প্রথম ধারণা ছিল যে এর ইন্টারফেস এবং ব্যবহারের অভিজ্ঞতা বেশ সাবলীল।